Hamel Husain benchmarks decision models for evals: default 0.5 threshold leaves performance on the table

JosephJacks_ · x · 2026-10-22

Hamel Husain and Antaripa Saha published a deep dive on choosing decision models (TypeSafe Jev, Perplexity Decider 1.1 27B, Liquid d1/d1-ultra, Cloudflare Clef Flash, OpenAI Decisions on GPT-6 Luna) as low-cost alternatives to LLM judges for automated evals. Using 100 traces from an apartment leasing agent with a failure-detection task, they show: the default 0.50 threshold often wastes significant performance and should be tuned per task; calibration matters — one Clef Flash group averaged 8% predicted failure probability while 60% actually contained failures, while Jev and d1-ultra were already well calibrated; Platt scaling isn't always best (OpenAI's probabilities got slightly worse). The post covers threshold tuning, cost/performance tradeoffs, score interpretation, and includes a prompt for having a coding agent perform calibration.

Related event: Hamel Husain's Guide: Using Decision Models for Evals, Don't Default to 0.5 Threshold(10 posts)→

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →