Retracting old papers: 'Is it still load-bearing?' beats 'Is it too old?'
iskander · x · 2026-10-22
James Heathers revisits whether old scientific papers should be retracted. His framework: judge papers by whether they're still cited and load-bearing in live discourse, not by publication date; author status sadly shapes outcomes; and the severity/contamination extent of defects matters. He argues institutional unwillingness, not genuine uncertainty, is the main obstacle to retraction — and new analysis tools will surface more problems in old data. Shared with a Simpsons meme mocking '66 toxicologists who are wrong.'
More from Fun
- New Siri Slammed for Worse Latency — Requests Now Just Hit a Bigger LM — saurabh_shah2 · 2026-10-22
- The 'What is it like to be a bot?' bat sticker made it into Kevin Roose's new book — lfschiavo · 2026-10-22
- Route 47, a sci-fi horror comedy series made entirely with AI, wraps Season 4 — Mr_AllenT · 2026-10-22
- Guzey's satirical 'Planes are decades from displacing most bird jobs' essay resurfaces — alexeyguzey · 2026-10-22
- Meta's Muse 'blatantly broken' and nobody at the company noticed — inductionheads · 2026-10-22
- 'Got any of that Qwen4?' meme — and the whole image was made by Gemini Flash — Fz1zz · 2026-10-22