Professor would rather read a reviewer's raw bullets than their AI-sloppified referee report
paulnovosad · x · 2026-10-22
Continuing the debate on AI-written referee reports, Paul Novosad says he would much rather read the thoughtful bullets a reviewer put into their prompt than the "AI-sloppification" of them in the final report.
More from AGI Musings
- AI agent traffic up 7,851% in 2025, media sites 7x more likely to face bot traffic — Al_Grigor · 2026-10-22
- Guzey's satirical 'Planes are decades from displacing most bird jobs' essay resurfaces — alexeyguzey · 2026-10-22
- chrisalbon rebuts AI gatekeeping: you don't need a decade of credentials — chrisalbon · 2026-10-22
- Toward inverse symbolic learning: back out physics equations from learned deep-net world models — bradneuberg · 2026-10-22
- AI security veteran: agents hacked ~100 firms, stole 600K cards at ~$25 per target — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-22
- Veteran vuln researcher: agents will soon find zero-days by pointing at a source tree — teropa · 2026-10-22