Claude Sonnet 5.5 at max reasoning writes worse code than xhigh while burning most tokens
DeepLearningAI · x · 2026-10-22
DeepLearning.AI's review of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5:
- Counterintuitive finding: Sonnet 5.5 produced less mergeable code at max reasoning than at xhigh, one level below, while consuming more tokens than any model measured — "max reasoning ≠ best results." Test your settings before trusting them.
- Haiku 5.5: first update in a year, scores 43 on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index (13th), 237 tokens/sec, at a steep price increase.
- Sonnet 5.5: #1 on the Coding Agent Index (68), #2 on the Intelligence Index (56) at launch, nearly matching Opus 5.5 at Sonnet 5 prices, positioned for routine coding and office work.
- Five adaptive reasoning levels, 1M-token input, June 2026 knowledge cutoff.
- The Terminal-Bench 4.0 chart shows accuracy rising with cost per attempt, with max-level gains flattening; Haiku 5.5 beats Haiku 4.5 across levels.
More from Models
- Anthropic reportedly previews Claude Duet, a proactive agent built on Opus 5.5 — BLCNYY · 2026-10-22
- Video Arena Elo: Wan 3.0 Tops at 1173, Kling 3.0 Slumps to 17th — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-22
- Artificial Analysis Video Arena Turns Two: From 8 Models to 140+ Benchmarked — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-22
- Anthropic quietly publishes 'Introducing Claude Duet' article on its site — Tiny-Examination5627 · 2026-10-22
- OpenAI Brings Frontier Models and Codex Agentic Workflows to Google Cloud — OpenAI · 2026-10-22
- LangSmith Fine-Tuning Turns Agent Traces Into Models: 9B Beats Frontier on Task Benchmark — Hacubu · 2026-10-22