giffmana clarifies his scaling-cost argument doesn't contradict Papail
giffmana · x · 2026-10-20
giffmana follows up that his earlier point doesn't actually contradict Dimitris Papail — the core remains diminishing returns on capability gains. Minimal new information; kept as debate context.
Related event: Researchers Debate Why Each AI Capability Level Costs ~10x More(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Carissa Véliz: algorithms are often the hitmen companies send to execute their will to power — CarissaVeliz · 2026-10-20
- UK government advisers warn Britain risks becoming a 'high-value AI customer' — Polymarket · 2026-10-20
- Mathematician says AI proved a combinatorics conjecture, now wonders where to share it — tak3sh8 · 2026-10-20
- Altman reportedly outlined three superintelligence endgames to OpenAI staff, including one lab locking out all rivals — kimmonismus · 2026-10-20
- Moshi CEO Anekha Sokhal: AI should do the quant grind, humans keep the edge — AI Engineer · 2026-10-20
- School trains you to fear mistakes, not to survive being ignored — birchlse · 2026-10-20