Red teamers share AI safety findings that seemed harmless until they weren't
Plastic_Secret1303 · reddit · 2026-10-19
A Reddit discussion asks AI red teamers about findings they initially dismissed but later realized were serious—cases that looked like harmless responses until checking tool calls, following the conversation, or testing with different permissions. Focus is on why such risks are easy to underestimate, not on sharing payloads.
More from Safety
- GPT-4.1 with RAG hits 92.1% accuracy reviewing clinical trial informed consent forms — lamechthinkbig · 2026-10-19
- Claude's answer to Musk's Grok-DMs tip nails the prompt injection risk — alex_verem · 2026-10-19
- Musk warns many will be 'one-shotted' by super-persuasive superintelligences — elonmusk · 2026-10-19
- Gemini's critical summary of a safety report surfaces downplayed residual risks — davidmanheim · 2026-10-19
- Why aren't AI companies sued for unauthorized crawling and agent harm? — warfunder · 2026-10-19
- Training-Free Weight Editing Cuts Harmful Compliance: Honesty Rate 31% to 88% — AI-Interpretability-illinois · 2026-10-19