Thought experiment: does AI knowledge count if no human can understand it?
mariofilhoml · x · 2026-10-19
A playful thought experiment: in 2030, a scientist feeds data on a distant, practically useless black hole to an AI, which returns an explanation no human can understand. Has knowledge actually increased?
The replier pushes on the definition: if knowledge means data that another AI, human, or any future being can learn from or query, then machine-only-comprehensible explanations still count. It cuts to the core debate around AI scientific discovery — must knowledge be human-understandable to be knowledge?
More from AGI Musings
- Counter-meme take: in an AI world, the smartest humans may matter more than ever — shakoistsLog · 2026-10-19
- Automation paradox: agriculture fell from 40% to 2% of GDP while output soared — zacharynado · 2026-10-19
- The Dark Ages as a template: why civilizational decline can seed a new order — floguo · 2026-10-19
- PhysClosureBench: Opus 5-5 Tops Atomic Score but Closes Research in Only 32.7% — Shanghai-AI-Laboratory · 2026-10-19
- X debate: does intelligence require consciousness? The burden-of-proof argument — brandon_xyzw · 2026-10-19
- Hot take: AI guardrails are just content warnings pretending to be intelligence — PierceLilholt · 2026-10-19