The classic alignment debate: nobody has read the interpretability paper, everyone argues anyway
beffjezos · x · 2026-10-17
Bezos amplifies a satirical AI-circle dialogue about interpretability research: one side claims "Nick's interpretability paper means alignment can be solved," the other pushes back "it's not that black and white," they challenge each other on whether they've read the paper — and neither has. A pointed jab at position-first, source-never arguing in alignment discourse.
More from Fun
- Only Grok's bot managed to join her livestream and help backstage — ciguleva · 2026-10-17
- AI assistant solves a captcha in two tries, better than its human boss — FlorianGallwitz · 2026-10-17
- Linus wrote Git alone in 10 days; Anthropic took 5 months with Claude — AccBalanced · 2026-10-17
- Tony Hawk and Bam Margera star in another escalating ad — part IV to be filmed live at NYSE — johncoogan · 2026-10-17
- Cybertruck photographed scaling a near-vertical slope — beffjezos · 2026-10-17
- Users who fled Twitter over AI fears now say Bluesky is pushing gen AI anyway — nptacek · 2026-10-17