Full understanding means explaining circuits—and it's not looking good
JacobHHilton · x · 2026-10-17
Jacob Hilton argues that full understanding requires going beyond neurons to explain how they connect into circuits, and by his assessment current progress is "not looking good"—a pivot into his case study of Anthropic's attribution graph papers.
Related event: ARC's Jacob Hilton Sparks Debate: Interpretability Far From Solved(22 posts)→
More from Research
- Anthropic researchers: superposition isn't the blocker, interpretability is more tractable than assumed — akbirthko · 2026-10-17
- GEMMU benchmark exposes 3 pitfalls that made multimodal unlearning look better than it is — _vztu · 2026-10-17
- Parser-free code index for AI agents cuts grep bills 42% with 4x smaller tool outputs — microbass · 2026-10-17
- Quiz: how many trainable params does GPT-2 use just for embed and unembed? — Sauers_ · 2026-10-17
- Google grounds AI agents in wet-lab robotics, discovers nanomolar cancer protein binders — davidpattersonx · 2026-10-17
- Paper stuck at JMLR for over a year: researcher shares where to submit instead of TMLR — avt_im · 2026-10-17