British output rose 46% but wages only 12% from 1780-1840—a warning for AI
oran_ge · x · 2026-10-16
Drawing on Industrial Revolution history, this post notes that from 1780 to 1840 British per-capita output rose 46% while real wages rose only 12%—technological progress didn't automatically enrich workers. Only after decades of labor struggle and the rise of unions did wage growth exceed output growth. The author frames this as context for understanding Engels, and as an implicit warning for the AI era: output gains don't automatically translate into income gains without institutional change.
Related event: Industrial Revolution Data Shows Tech Gains Don't Reach Workers(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Hinton hits back at Jensen Huang: 'He has good reason to say AI isn't dangerous — he sells Nvidia chips' — BlackHC · 2026-10-16
- Yudkowsky blasts new interpretability finding as primitive; critic pushes back on doomer logic — AlexTensor · 2026-10-16
- Beff Jezos declares 'civilizational inflection point' in the acceleration of technological progress — beffjezos · 2026-10-16
- Data scientist: pivoting to AI engineering is the safest career bet for the next 5 years — mdancho84 · 2026-10-16
- AI will be superhuman at science regardless, and Europe can't opt out — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-16
- beffjezos to Aaron Levie: techno-optimism is hyperstitious — basedjensen · 2026-10-16