"Anyone itching to press the universe-destroying button is untrustworthy": AI safety spat
jd_pressman · x · 2026-10-16
A fragment of an ongoing AI safety debate. Discussing a thought experiment, jdpressman argues that even if the button doesn't exist, someone who goes around saying "I want to press the button that destroys the universe so bad—the next universe will be so good" is antisocial and untrustworthy 99%+ of the time. His point: judge people by their eagerness for the destructive act rather than the heavenly promise attached to it—widely read as a jab at accelerationist narratives.
Related event: Researcher jd_pressman Rejects Successionism in AI Alignment Debate(9 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Grady Booch: LLMs can't reason, P(doom) near zero, real fear is power-grabbing billionaires — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-16
- Vals AI test: 6 personal agents pursue a £350 refund aggressively after user goes silent — ricklamers · 2026-10-16
- OpenAI's internal model shows real math "research taste," experts say its proofs go beyond prior literature — cong_ml · 2026-10-16
- willcb: AI's endpoint looks like faster, cheaper human-reasoning-on-chip — willcb · 2026-10-16
- AI Alignment's Problem May Be Its Researchers Are Too High-Functioning — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-16
- This vintage-style 'linguistic evolution' chart showing computers breaking humanity's language ceiling is going viral in AI circles — repligate · 2026-10-16