AA-Robotics debut: GPT-6 Astra tops real robot-arm benchmark but runs ~100x slower than humans

机器之心 · wechat · 2026-10-15

ArtificialAnalysis launched AA-Robotics v0.1, having frontier models control a real 6-axis arm via coding agents on eight zero-shot tasks.

First results: GPT-6 Astra scored 69.4, GPT-6.1 Sol 64.6 (with the most perfect task scores at five), Gemini 4 Argon 55.3, Claude Opus 5.5 / Fable 5.1 48.8 / 46.3. All models passed the easiest tasks; only Astra poured water and wrote "hello world"; nobody aced the block tower — Sol built a valid tower then knocked it over.

Efficiency gap: tasks took 30 minutes on average vs a 20-second human baseline (nearly two orders of magnitude slower); 60% of time goes to planning and only 13% to actual arm motion. Astra cost $16.36 per task vs $1.93 for Sol, which scored just 4.8 points lower. Grasp success rates hovered at 28-45%.

The debate: general models can now "act," but embodied-AI founders argue reliable physical interaction still needs dedicated data, VLA models and control policies. The first batch includes no Chinese models — whether Qwen, Kimi, GLM or DeepSeek make the next list is worth watching.

Related event: Artificial Analysis Launches AA-Robotics Benchmark; GPT-6 Astra Tops Ranking(3 posts)→

Original post →

More from Embodied

Embodied channel →