OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof appears to use a fundamentally different approach, review finds
FlorianGallwitz · x · 2026-10-15
After OpenAI published its 166-page Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize proof, critics claimed the AI had built on an approach pioneered by two Spanish mathematicians. But per Scientific American, mathematicians examining the proof now conclude OpenAI's AI may have developed a fundamentally different approach — burying the popular narrative that the model cribbed from human work.
Related event: Plagiarism claims against OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof debunked(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Nathan Lambert: distillation buys a few months, Chinese labs lack compute not talent — natolambert · 2026-10-15
- Argon hits cyber, CBRN CCLs and misalignment TCL; report flags CoT transparency — vkrakovna · 2026-10-15
- First Proof batch 3: mathematicians grade GPT-6, Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3 on research-level proofs — littmath · 2026-10-15
- Google tops Signal65 PINNACLE agentic leaderboard: Gemini 4 Argon at $0.87 per correct task beats Sonnet and GPT — ryanshrout · 2026-10-15
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash tops cost-efficiency at $0.134 per task, leaderboard shows — bindureddy · 2026-10-15
- Gemini's New Argon Image Model Keeps Generating Distorted 'Little People' — RecognitionHefty · 2026-10-15