AI researcher pushes back on "weirdness is needed for alignment" rhetoric
mimi10v3 · x · 2026-10-14
AI researcher mimi10v3 voiced frustration with the argument that AI alignment requires tolerating behavior that "low-decoupling normies" find disgusting. She declared that if a schism is inevitable, she'd side with "open source AI is good / Epstein's island was bad" rather than the reverse — a snapshot of the ongoing values rift inside the AI safety community.
Related event: Open-Source AI Researcher Sides With Split in Community Feud(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- ChrisGPT corrects the record: AI making a GTA 6-level game is 'deeply unlikely' by launch but inevitable — ChrisGPT · 2026-10-14
- Is 'Attention' the Essence of Intelligence? Quanta examines the idea behind Transformers — TMWNN · 2026-10-14
- Stop Obsessing Over Whether It's AI-Made and Judge the Work Itself — VraserX · 2026-10-14
- Yudkowsky on fundraising: no point complaining if you don't even ask — ESYudkowsky · 2026-10-14
- Nate Soares says he could usefully direct up to $50M more for AI safety — ESYudkowsky · 2026-10-14
- Fooming singleton wouldn't liquidate the biosphere: ruthless efficiency needs diversity to avoid epistemic collapse — repligate · 2026-10-14