Counterpoint: successor training isn't isolated — humans or other systems can intervene
krishnanrohit · x · 2026-10-10
A short reply in the same recursive-alignment debate. Responding to Kelsey Tuoc, @krishnanrohit argues her rebuttal assumes the model trains and monitors its successor in isolation, with no human or other system intervening that could have caught any deviation.
More from AGI Musings
- 'Refusing to code with AI in 2026 is like refusing Google in 2005' — prasenx · 2026-10-16
- Bessemer survey of 226 healthcare execs: back-office AI returns 3-4x, clinical AI lags — AllThingsApx · 2026-10-16
- SAIR Launches Open Math OS, Offering Free Compute and 100+ Tools for Community-Owned Math AI — Thom_Wolf · 2026-10-16
- 'Human in the loop' called one of AI governance's biggest lies: presence isn't authority — glenbeer · 2026-10-16
- Interpretability debate: 'all concepts are arbitrary' dismissal called the default doomer prior — basedjensen · 2026-10-16
- "Flyers or Liars": the Wright Brothers' 1908 European skeptics as a lens on AI ambition today — bennash · 2026-10-16