Google paper: evolving the agent harness doubles GPT-5-mini's SWE-bench score to 48.3%

bittingthembits · x · 2026-10-13

A new Google paper (Evo²) shows the harness around an agent — tools, memory, workflow — matters as much as the model. One AI plays two roles: a Proposer edits its own harness, a Reflector diagnoses each edit; edits and results become training data via "Studying the Textbook" and "Scrimmage Practice." Same GPT-5-mini, better harness: 24.4% → 48.3% on a SWE-bench Verified subset (strongest baseline 41.0%), 82.1% vs 62.6% on Polyglot, with evolved harnesses transferring across benchmarks. Note: the tweet also shills a $TAO token; verify against the paper.

Related event: DeepMind Paper Evolves Agent Harness Together with Weights(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →