How do you eval agents when outputs are never the same twice?
SnooDingos9560 · reddit · 2026-10-13
A Reddit poster asks how to tell whether an agent change actually improved things when outputs are non-deterministic: hand-picked task sets go stale, LLM judges carry their own biases, and checklist scoring has limited coverage. They ask what people actually use and whether it has caught real regressions.
More from coding & agent
- Prompting Opus 5.5 with Blender to build a ramen shop yields "unmatched" 3D results — victormustar · 2026-10-13
- Voyager launches as an open harness driving Opus, Astra and DeepSeek across Blender, Resolve and 100+ creative tools — ravisparikh · 2026-10-13
- toyxyz open-sources dual Anima ControlNet-LLLite adapters for 3D pose and region control — bdsqlsz · 2026-10-13
- CoreWeave Demos Agent Lens to Catch the 1% of Agent Conversations That Go Wrong — altryne · 2026-10-13
- Gamma 5 agent chat leaks raw internal XML path during launch week — Mental-Tennis-6313 · 2026-10-13
- Theo benchmarks Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and Muse Wonder Full on a bug fix — shadcn · 2026-10-13