AI art critics say art is human expression, then rage when ordinary people can finally express themselves
VraserX · x · 2026-10-13
The author calls out a contradiction among AI art critics: they insist art is fundamentally about human expression, yet get furious the moment ordinary people gain tools to express things they couldn't create before. The jab: apparently human expression only counts if you pay someone with the right skills to do it for you.
Related event: AI Art Debate Flares Over Ordinary People Creating(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Alignment is stuck because it lacks MNIST-style benchmarks, researcher argues — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-13
- Is consciousness something you do, not have? AI as an evolutionary handoff — VoidStateKate · 2026-10-13
- 722 math papers land in one day, mathematicians call for boycott next day — rand_longevity · 2026-10-13
- IT's productivity boost has faded: enterprises spend big without seeing returns — DavidLinthicum · 2026-10-13
- scaling01 mocks AI skeptics: 'meaningless' frontier progress keeps bankrupting shorts — scaling01 · 2026-10-13
- The bleeding edge of AI adoption: letting it buy stuff for you — granawkins · 2026-10-13