Senior Engineer Benchmark: Muse Wonder scores 52%, well behind Claude and GPT coding models
danshipper · x · 2026-10-13
Dan Shipper tested Muse Wonder on Checks' Senior Engineer Benchmark, which asks models to rewrite a vibe-coded slop codebase from scratch as a proxy for real-world engineering usefulness. Muse Wonder scored 52%, far behind gpt-6.1-sol at 71%. Full scoreboard: claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5 (Claude Code, high effort) both 85%, gpt-6-astra 81%, gpt-6.1-sol 71%, muse-wonder-1.0 52%, gpt-6-sol 35%. It's a single-task, one-person benchmark scored by checks the author actually uses, not a general quality claim.
Related event: Muse Wonder Lags Far Behind Sol 6.1 on Senior Engineer Benchmark(3 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- huashu-art-motion skill lets Claude Opus paint animations in 35 art styles with code — anselm · 2026-10-13
- AI writes code 100x faster, but watch out for slopsquatting supply-chain attacks — Thionne_WTZ · 2026-10-13
- Open ComfyUI workflow paints full UV textures for MakeHuman characters from one image — o0ANARKY0o · 2026-10-13
- Building a verification MCP: why pass/fail scores aren't enough for agent debugging — Practical_Green5775 · 2026-10-13
- Fine-tuning speech models for Algerian Darija: a team's four open questions — Fair_Bed_914 · 2026-10-13
- Devtool companies that had mindshare just years ago have lost all relevance to AI — andreisavu · 2026-10-13