Oncologist rebuts Terence Tao: positive Phase 3 data trumps understanding drug mechanisms
VPrasadMDMPH · x · 2026-10-13
Oncologist Vinay Prasad pushed back on Terence Tao's claim that patients would want a human expert to understand an AI-derived cancer cure before taking it.
- Many widely used cancer drugs (Adriamycin, docetaxel, ibrutinib, venetoclax) still have poorly understood mechanisms of action.
- If a Phase 3 trial is positive, doctors and patients will adopt a therapy regardless of whether the mechanism is known — that's top-tier evidence in oncology.
- Context: Tao's original argument framed AI's brute-force puzzle solving as analogous to accepting cures no human expert understands.
Related event: Oncologist Fires Back at Terence Tao Over AI in Cancer Medicine(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- What's the strongest mechanistic case that next-token prediction plus RL yields AGI? — Repulsive_Twist_9221 · 2026-10-13
- AI-Powered Paper Mills Fuel Academic Fraud Crisis, Scholars Blame Publication Metrics — asusarla · 2026-10-13
- Karpathy says only about 5,000 people have seen what AI can really do — sourdub · 2026-10-13
- Essay proposes parallel AI courts to relieve caseload strain on human judges — sebkrier · 2026-10-13
- Existential-risk debate misses the elephant: AI's toll on young people — BachFrancis · 2026-10-13
- mayfer: turn-based RL can't close AGI's gap — realtime perception is required — mayfer · 2026-10-13