jd_pressman Doubles Down: My DMs Could Be Discoverable If Lawyers Believed I Witnessed It
jd_pressman · x · 2026-10-13
Replying to ohabryka, jdpressman conceded his phrasing was vague but stood by the legal point: if plaintiffs' lawyers believed he witnessed the events in question (he clarifies he doesn't live in SF and did not), his DMs with her could indeed be discoverable, while his own testimony would be inadmissible hearsay. It's the direct rebuttal in the ongoing spat over trusting ChatGPT's legal answers.
More from Fun
- Professor's meme about 'your friend who decided not to pursue a PhD' hits a nerve — prof_kamilov · 2026-10-13
- Founder's SF loop: return, comparison, burnout, leave — repeated five times — Zachly · 2026-10-13
- A more competent alt-rat leader could reshape the rationalist community's dynamics — jessi_cata · 2026-10-13
- Community votes Midjourney the highest-aura company, beating Thinking Machines and SSI — noahsolomon · 2026-10-13
- Privacy researcher: maybe nothing should be connected to the internet anymore — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-13
- LinkedIn profile lists 'Hacking LLMs' job starting May 2026, from the future — Sauers_ · 2026-10-13