Researcher: Muse beats Dots on tool calls in my tests — now open the weights
evijit · x · 2026-10-13
Responding to Meta's new model release, researcher evijit says Muse works significantly better than Dots for tool-call tasks in his experience, with a personalization style that feels less robotic — making Meta's benchmark numbers credible to him. He calls on Meta to open the weights.
Related event: Developer Tests Show Muse Beats Dots in Tool Calling(2 posts)→
More from Models
- ReplaySSM ships in GLM-5.3-Flash and Kimi-K3, speeding decoding up to 2.1x — SonglinYang4 · 2026-10-13
- AI2's TutorMoments eval: GPT-6 models over-help least, detailed prompts beat "tutor well" — allen_ai · 2026-10-13
- AI2's TutorMoments benchmarks AI tutors on 520 real moments; human tutors score 0.458 — allen_ai · 2026-10-13
- Allen AI's TutorMoments Benchmark Finds LLM Tutors Over-Help Students — allen_ai · 2026-10-13
- DeepSeek's flash endpoint may be quietly testing a new model, users speculate v4.1-pro — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-13
- 3D game demos hint at AI creativity that transfers to CAD, docs and UI tasks — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-13