Dev hands-on: Muse clearly beats Dots on tool calling, personalization feels natural
evijit · x · 2026-10-13
Reacting to the Muse Wonder launch, developer evijit shares first-hand experience: for tool-call type tasks, Muse works significantly better than Dots in his testing, so the benchmark numbers make sense to him. He also notes Muse's personalization feels notably less robotic, though he struggles to articulate why.
Related event: Developer Tests Show Muse Beats Dots in Tool Calling(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Snap's new decision model handles 384K tokens per call at $0.05/M input, free output — thisdudelikesAI · 2026-10-13
- ThursdAI: OpenAI drops 722 math manuscripts, Haiku 5.5 hits 10 cents, agent leaks bank balance — thursdai_pod · 2026-10-13
- Open weights go big: Reflection AI's 501B Beam, Mistral's 1T Large 4, Aleph Alpha's Kolibri — thursdai_pod · 2026-10-13
- Meta's rumored Muse Wonder beats Claude Opus 5.5 on several agent and coding benchmarks — Dr_Singularity · 2026-10-13
- Wonder Full is a good model, but Meta still trails OpenAI by ~3-6 months — scaling01 · 2026-10-13
- Muse team member celebrates coding work hitting SOTA 'again and again' — jyangballin · 2026-10-13