Muse 'Watermelon' benchmarks leak: near-frontier scores vs Claude Opus 5.5
brandon_galang · x · 2026-10-13
A leaked/shared benchmark chart for Muse's 'Watermelon' models shows Muse Wonder Full (max) scoring 59.1 on the Personal Superintelligence Index, beating Claude Fable 5.1 (49.9), GPT-6 Astra (54.5) and Claude Opus 5.5 (55.2), with leads on Harvey LAB-AA (13.1), AutomationBench-AA (45.4), DeepSWE 1.1 (79.0) and SWE-Marathon (57.5). The poster argues Muse speedran the frontier faster than xAI did with Grok 4, though it likely still trails Anthropic's in-progress models — and cautions the results may be benchmaxxed. Note: post includes a referral promo code.
Related event: Meta Unveils Muse Wonder, Its Most Capable Agentic Frontier Model(88 posts)→
More from Models
- OpenAI models seem 'lobotomized' on weekdays, developer complains — sterlingcrispin · 2026-10-13
- Muse Wonder scores ~42% on senior engineer benchmark vs Sol 6.1's 71% — danshipper · 2026-10-13
- Zuckerberg unveils Muse Wonder, a frontier model family for agentic work — RebeccaBellan · 2026-10-13
- OpenAI's Decisions API hits 98.1% F1 vs agent's 93.5% at 1/7 cost and 28x lower p90 latency — OpenAIDevs · 2026-10-13
- Alexandr Wang admits Muse Wonder wasn't trained on 3D game demos, insists it excels at real coding — alexandr_wang · 2026-10-13
- Leaked terms suggest X Premium + Grok + Cursor bundled subscription: social, AI and IDE in one plan — ns123abc · 2026-10-13