Even quantum sensing and simulation can't bypass human validation, argues gregmushen
gregmushen · x · 2026-10-13
Continuing the longevity debate, gregmushen responds to optimism about quantum sensing (1,000,000x more biological-state information) and quantum simulation (far better predictions): even assuming both, the question returns to how we know predictions actually happen in humans. He strengthens his paradox — ASI would make empirical science look relatively slower, because the feedback loop involves events generated by reality, which gates every hypothesis.
More from AGI Musings
- From CSS Zen Garden to headless internet: HCI is becoming HHI — signulll · 2026-10-13
- Amazon now has over 1 million robot workers. What's next for human employees? — lulzxdxdxd · 2026-10-13
- Claymation won't die to AI: the process matters as much as the product — dylfreed · 2026-10-13
- Philosopher Carissa Véliz on how automatic AI translation erases language culture — CarissaVeliz · 2026-10-13
- Every's Thesis: 2027 conference to explore human work after automation — every · 2026-10-13
- Grady Booch: coding agents merely pattern-match and can't do real architecture — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-13