Luiza Jarovsky argues superintelligence alignment may be an absurd concept
LuizaJarovsky · x · 2026-10-12
AI researcher Luiza Jarovsky makes a provocative argument: superintelligence (SI) alignment may be absurd, since it rests on a human notion of "good" and "bad" that only applies to human-to-human or human-to-tool contexts. She questions why smarter-than-human autonomous machines would abide by human values or prioritize humans at all — a fundamental challenge to classic alignment assumptions.
Related event: Researcher Argues Superintelligence Alignment May Be a False Concept(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- rakyll: attacked last year for saying coding agents move too fast, still worth watching — rakyll · 2026-10-13
- AI-Assisted Stories Score Higher but All Sound Alike, Science Advances Study Finds — lmoroney · 2026-10-13
- GPT-4 story help boosts novelty 8.1% but homogenizes writing, study finds — lmoroney · 2026-10-13
- exurb1a's new video: "The Toddlers Have Bazookas Now" sparks AI risk debate — c0med · 2026-10-13
- Beijing issues identity cards to AI digital humans, raising AI accountability questions — tallmetommy · 2026-10-13
- NotebookLM-generated fake podcast with 13 episodes and ads passes as real show — omooretweets · 2026-10-13