Luiza Jarovsky: superintelligence alignment may be an absurd premise
LuizaJarovsky · x · 2026-10-12
AI ethics researcher Luiza Jarovsky argues that superintelligence alignment may be absurd, since it rests on a human notion of "good" and "bad" that only applies to human-to-human or human-to-tool contexts. Plants and animals cannot be "aligned"—why would smarter-than-human autonomous machines be?
Related event: Researcher Argues Superintelligence Alignment May Be a False Concept(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Two to three weeks after leaving a frontier lab, your AI knowledge is obsolete — tallinzen · 2026-10-12
- 'Regulation is a one-way ratchet': AI safety figures debate the Jensen view — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-12
- After the AI math controversy, a case for guilds to defend human craft — pixlpa · 2026-10-12
- Claude now leads 26% of Anthropic's model R&D, up from under 1% in February — nathanbenaich · 2026-10-12
- Pedro Domingos on harness learning paper: the model swallows the harness — DanielKhashabi · 2026-10-12
- Is 'Attention' the Essence of Intelligence? Quanta traces the mechanism from 2014 to LLMs — calabi_and_yau · 2026-10-12