Nimble team responds to attribution dispute, promises to add credit
antoine_chaffin · x · 2026-10-12
Bespoke Labs' antoinechaffin responded to the accusation that Perplexity's decider model used Nimble code without credit, explaining the code likely came from Denis's original Auto Research run, which served as the base for v1.1 before being merged into their own training stack. He pledged to review the code and add acknowledgment for previous versions, apologizing for the oversight.
Related event: Perplexity Open Model Faces Attribution Dispute over Nimble Code(2 posts)→
More from Models
- AI researcher: Claude finally finished tedious research tasks I gave up on years ago — MikePFrank · 2026-10-23
- Dream Labs emerges from stealth with Dream-1 robot foundation model at $3/hour — scott_e_reed · 2026-10-23
- Claude Models on Google Cloud (Anthropic managed) is now generally available — claudeai · 2026-10-23
- Beam vs GLM 5.3 Abliterated: 10-round attack/defense test shows 96% of vulns patched — bigblueboo · 2026-10-23
- ChatGPT web can actually listen to audio, but the same model can't via API or Codex — Possible_Statement84 · 2026-10-23
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash free for 3 days on 0G, with 1M context and 512K output — MiniMax_AI · 2026-10-23