An 11-year SEO vet on where Claude + Python works (and fails) in technical audits
memon1 · reddit · 2026-10-12
A technical SEO practitioner with 11+ years of experience shares how LLMs fit into audit workflows.
Where it works: grouping thousands of URLs by template/intent from crawl exports; comparing pre/post-migration crawls; drafting schema markup for manual validation; spotting patterns in log files and Search Console exports.
Where it fails: prioritization — it ranks fixes by what sounds important, not what moves traffic; anything needing real rendering context; large datasets pasted directly — Python does the heavy lifting and the LLM reads only summarized output.
His rule: the LLM handles repetitive analysis, he handles decisions, and every output gets checked against source data.
More from coding & agent
- Open-Source TikTok Live Stream Server for Overlays, Triggers and More — talkaboutdesign · 2026-10-12
- Open-Source Qalign Node Fixes Pixel Drift in Qwen Image 2.1 Edits — listopalafoto · 2026-10-12
- Codex runs tests obsessively while Claude is faster — two coding agents, different personalities — haider1 · 2026-10-12
- Video-RSI: Video Understanding Agents Recursively Self-Improve Their Harness — Bingjun Luo · 2026-10-12
- Stanford's Stateless Language Agents Match Best Kernel Baseline With 84% Fewer Tokens — StanfordUniversity · 2026-10-12
- Open-source Rust Photoshop clone PhotoCraft hits 48.5k stars with 7,000 contributors in days — alfcnz · 2026-10-12