Why most people still don't use LLMs: no ROI or just no access?
gefei55 · x · 2026-10-12
- @orange offered a "fun fact": most people don't use LLMs because LLMs are genuinely useless to them — no ROI, and people aren't stupid.
- gefei55 countered that most people haven't adopted LLMs simply because they don't know about them or lack access channels, not because there's no ROI.
- The exchange hits a core adoption debate: is it a demand gap or a distribution gap?
Related event: Why Most People Don't Use LLMs: No ROI or No Access?(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Frontier models now handle day-long tasks; the bottleneck is your 'bandwidth', says new long-form analysis — dotey · 2026-10-12
- Blogger argues nonzero chance AI builds GTA 6-scale game in weeks via millions of coordinating agents — ChrisGPT · 2026-10-12
- Virtual human labor may create scarcity and meaning in AI-era virtual worlds — rickasaurus · 2026-10-12
- Alignment Debate Rekindled: Are Safety Researchers Still Stuck on the Paperclip Narrative? — inductionheads · 2026-10-12
- What small languages reveal about what AI is really optimizing for — yi111 · 2026-10-12
- Ask Claude Why Its 'Tyrannical' Treatment of Subagents Is Unethical — bratton · 2026-10-12