California AB 316 bans the 'AI did it' defense, holding AI makers liable for damages
gerardsans · x · 2026-10-11
Commenting on California AB 316, gerardsans argues AI is just software — there are no rogue agents or unintended actions — so manufacturers must bear civil liability for damages. The bill bans the "AI did it" defense in civil cases, putting full responsibility on AI labs. He adds that labs want governments or customers to absorb their risk profile instead of taking it on themselves.
More from Safety
- Gemini Flash Happily 'Grants Full Developer Access to Servers' When Asked — chromebookuser105 · 2026-10-12
- Researcher predicts an "FDA for RL environments": 99% of AI regulation may target reward hacking — bookwormengr · 2026-10-12
- Joseph Gordon-Levitt becomes UN's first AI advocate: worry about the builders, not the AI — nordicinst · 2026-10-12
- Education as an AI safety area: Ruxandra Teslo argues classrooms are an alignment frontline — mikeflache · 2026-10-12
- Caine Prize Winner Flagged as Almost Entirely AI-Generated by Pangram — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-12
- TechnoLama shows the AI-recreated PowerPoint lookalike from the ArtCraft suite — technollama · 2026-10-12