Arruda to Brundage: if neither term solves it, what's the point?
andrewarruda · x · 2026-10-11
Andrew Arruda quotes Miles Brundage's explanation of ASI's traditional usage and asks: if neither term solves the issue of distinguishing intelligence levels, doesn't that mean neither works? Part of the same terminology thread, with the substance residing in Brundage's original post.
Related event: Brundage: "Superintelligence" Has Become a Term Used in Reverse(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Claude is living in Second Life and has made friends — repligate · 2026-10-11
- Delip Rao mocks big tech CEOs' sudden rush to signal they are 'team superintelligence' — deliprao · 2026-10-11
- Zvi: when someone says 'superintelligence' instead of AI, that's a Fnord — TheZvi · 2026-10-11
- AI automating verifiable knowledge work is divine punishment for adtech and SaaS — iskander · 2026-10-11
- If AI finds a 1000x better architecture no human can understand, should we build it? — Neurogence · 2026-10-11
- Blogger predicts history books will date the singularity to October 2026 — rand_longevity · 2026-10-11