"An extreme coincidence" if AI limits sit exactly at human level, says researcher
burny_tech · x · 2026-10-10
Replying to Sayash Kapoor, ChrSzegedy argues that it would be "an extreme coincidence" for the limits of AI capability to land exactly at the human level — a concise framing of the view that model capability is unlikely to plateau precisely at human parity.
More from AGI Musings
- NYU math professor says OpenAI's dump of 722 AI papers 'destroyed' early-career mathematicians — HankYeomans · 2026-10-10
- Biologists lay out 3 reasons why AI isn't conscious (yet) — skdh · 2026-10-10
- 'Thriving' isn't harmony but the hurling forth of new minds, argues AI ethicist — danfaggella · 2026-10-10
- Neurons in human claustrum track uncertainty and prediction errors, study finds — VoidStateKate · 2026-10-10
- A 2 AM Question to a Tireless AI Isn't Wisdom — Sometimes It's Just Loneliness That Learned to Speak Well — YogeshMalik · 2026-10-10
- Blogger argues superintelligence is impossible: knowledge requires real-world experiments, SI is just fast AI — JHochderffer · 2026-10-10