The key test: editing one number to see if each model's charts update correctly
CodeByPoonam · x · 2026-10-10
Follow-up in the benchmark: the author gave both models a chance to fix errors, then deliberately changed a number in the file to verify whether related calculations and charts updated correctly, and compared final results side by side — testing cross-document numerical consistency and self-correction.
Related event: Hands-on test checks AI decks by opening real files(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Same $0.10/$0.50 price, 40% different bills: GPT-6 Luna beats Haiku 5.5 in real billing test — aakashgupta · 2026-10-10
- GPU kernel bench leaks: DeepSeek v4.1 flash beats GLM-5.3 and Haiku 5.5 — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-10
- Step 5 Preview makes clean slides, Qwen goes report-style in Apple deck showdown — CodeByPoonam · 2026-10-10
- Blogger benchmarks StepFun Preview vs Qwen 3.8 Max on Apple FY2025 analysis deck — CodeByPoonam · 2026-10-10
- User says Grok bot's hidden subagents and instant replies ruin other LLM experiences — rudrank · 2026-10-10
- Researcher speculates new model uses continuous diffusion with latent-thinking loops in its architecture — mblondel_ml · 2026-10-10