Researcher notes OpenAI cited her paper that journals repeatedly rejected as 'too weird'
prof_g · x · 2026-10-09
Researcher profg (Gemma) points out the irony that OpenAI's sole citation of her work was an old paper that was rejected over and over for being too weird or irrelevant—a wry commentary on peer review and impact.
Related event: Researcher Recalls Rejections as 'Too Weird'—Yet OpenAI Cited Her Paper(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- AI-generated movie poster 'The Chase' crams a wolf, a plane and muscle cars into one chase — Aggravating-Sir-115 · 2026-10-23
- Reporter Loops an AI Agent to Hoard Shopping Cart Holds for Hours — lfschiavo · 2026-10-23
- Dating app rejection comes back with only an 'InvalidDateException' error message — gregmushen · 2026-10-23
- AI circle joke: mathematicians should teach 'ethics of matrix multiplication' for Anthropic's ToS — kuza55 · 2026-10-23
- AI-Generated Short 'My Little Monster And Me' Charms Reddit — No_Personality535 · 2026-10-23
- Nous Research merch tee shows up: 'Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God' — ChrisUniverse · 2026-10-23