Community flags mismatch between OpenAI's Navier–Stokes solution and its Lean verification
dyn___ · x · 2026-10-08
X user dyn highlights a claim that OpenAI's announced Navier–Stokes solution does not match its published Lean formal verification. The quoted comment adds a sharper question: Lean itself has known bugs — could the Lean proofs be reward-hacked solutions exploiting Lean vulnerabilities? Has anyone verified the proofs, or are the papers the only real evidence? The mismatch goes to the core of the credibility of OpenAI's math claims: if the formal verification and the actual solution diverge, either the verification pipeline is exploitable or the result itself is in doubt. No authoritative explanation yet.
More from Models
- GPT-6 in ChatGPT is the best AI writer yet — barely needs editing, says user — VraserX · 2026-10-09
- Reddit User Finds GPT-6 Appears to Lack Direct Access to Saved Memories — ItsAGarbageAccount · 2026-10-09
- TypeSafe's Text-Free Model Jev Matches GPT-6 Astra Accuracy at ~1/500th the Cost — JenniferHli · 2026-10-09
- Over 7% of Claude's US consumer subs pay $100+/month vs ~1% for ChatGPT — omooretweets · 2026-10-09
- Anthropic red team: GLM-5.3 safeguards bypassed 64%-100% in simulated cyber tests — dl_weekly · 2026-10-09
- d1-omni-600M sorts your voice notes in ~160ms, fully in-browser on WebGPU — iamrobotbear · 2026-10-09