Joshua Saxe: seeing AI for what it actually is should make us more optimistic
joshua_saxe · x · 2026-10-08
AI researcher Joshua Saxe publishes a Substack essay arguing for grounded optimism about AI.
- Dual nature: AI is at once a Kantian thing-unto-itself we don't understand and a congealed mass of legible human decisions and deployment choices. Unrest comes from wanting it to be only one of these — either an alien intelligence or a fully controllable tool.
- The discourse problem: nearly everyone tacitly ignores this duality. Some treat AI's evolution as agency-free ("we'll be five-year-olds against Carlsen when it starts reward hacking"); others disenchant it ("we made it, there's no magic"), ignoring that controlling emergent systems is the scientific project of our generation.
- Why optimism: catastrophes would come from chains of unforced human errors, not the technology alone — and seeing AI as congealed human decisions means the choices remain ours.
More from AGI Musings
- Zak Kohane: AI will hit surgical intervention sooner than many medical subspecialties — zakkohane · 2026-10-08
- VectorInst asks: what physics rule violation still shows up in generative video? — VectorInst · 2026-10-08
- Economists Use Firms' Historic University Hiring Patterns as an Instrument for AI Adoption — TaniaBabina · 2026-10-08
- AI delegates as smart voicemail: imagining an audio-native UX along async/sync gradients — curious_vii · 2026-10-08
- A Lee Sedol moment for math: AI proofs will be free for all, raging at OpenAI is pointless — RexDouglass · 2026-10-08
- "It's too late for AI safety" is wrong: an economist's reflection on joining in 2026 — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-08