Debate continues: should anyone who cleans up AI proof dumps get authorship?
conitzer · x · 2026-10-08
In the same thread, Conitzer suggests giving credit to anyone — even unknowns — who takes OpenAI's dumped proof results and genuinely cleans them up into well-written papers, extending the debate over authorship of AI-generated math.
Related event: Debate flares over how OpenAI should release AI-generated math proofs(5 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- ARK Analyst: Superintelligence Will Be History's Best Energy-to-GDP Converter — DMaguireARK · 2026-10-09
- Debating FDT's decade of stalled progress: ex ante optimality as an alternative frame — jessi_cata · 2026-10-09
- Nathan Lambert to argue open science can still tackle AI safety and diffusion — natolambert · 2026-10-09
- Terence Tao blog: Raghu Meka on how 'perceived barriers' cost math AI-solvable problems — jainprateek_ · 2026-10-09
- What Childhood Makes a Nobel Laureate? New Paper Weighs Family Background — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-09
- Building an API to the Physical World: How AI Agents Could Reindustrialize Manufacturing — McDonaghMatthew · 2026-10-09