Nobel economist Daron Acemoglu: making 100 people 5% more productive beats automating 5%
cen6wkf · reddit · 2026-10-07
Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu argues the '5% layoff math' many CFOs trust is backwards: automating 5% of roles to save half that slice moves the P&L less than making 100 people 5% more productive — and it holds up better when AI integration hits the jagged edge.
The poster supports this with structural engineering experience: offices have used powerful tools like STAAD Pro and SAP2000 since 1999 without firing junior engineers.
- Tools automate tasks, not jobs — seniors still cover client meetings and site inspections
- Judgment can't be outsourced: one engineer distrusted STAAD Pro's reinforcement designs (too close to BS8110 minimums) and designed reinforcement himself from its force diagrams
- Takeaway: AI agents assist rather than replace
More from AGI Musings
- The old route to math advances via conjecture-gathering will soon matter less, author argues — _onionesque · 2026-10-07
- Math as a strip mine: why AI can exploit decades of pre-mapped intermediate results — _onionesque · 2026-10-07
- Where AI can grind through math: well-formalized neighborhoods, not isolated frontiers — _onionesque · 2026-10-07
- After the Math Proofs Drop, Why Do So Many Still Deny AI Will Keep Improving — funkdoctor_spock · 2026-10-07
- When AI Beats a Doctor Visit: It's About Information vs Hands and Accountability — Void_x7600 · 2026-10-07
- AI risk discourse's totalizing nature makes some act like the power-seeking optimizers they fear — foundjuliette · 2026-10-07