CHI 2027 review rubric criticized: duplicate criteria, no "quality" dimension
IanArawjo · x · 2026-10-07
Researcher Ian Arawjo, reviewing for CHI 2027, flagged issues with the conference's review rubric: two categories (originality and novelty) are effectively duplicates, and there's no dimension for "quality." He notes research can be original, novel, important, correct, and well-written yet still poorly executed — something the rubric fails to capture.
More from Research
- Mistral Researcher Hails OpenAI Models Solving Important Math Problems — charliermarsh · 2026-10-07
- LeanLean benchmark: Opus 5.5 scores 64.3% compressing Lean proofs, GPT 6.1 Sol only 39.9% — ChrSzegedy · 2026-10-07
- PersistBench (NeurIPS Spotlight): 4D foundation models can see but not remember — weichiuma · 2026-10-07
- COLM 2026 poster: Differentiable Faithfulness Alignment for Cross-Model Circuit Transfer — boknilev · 2026-10-07
- OpenAI releases 722 AI-generated math manuscripts with partial Lean proofs — OpenAI · 2026-10-07
- OpenAI Publishes Blog Detailing Its Models' Progress on Mathematical Research — OfficialTurkey · 2026-10-07