'People generated 36000 papers': AI spam forces a rethink of peer review
ObhishekSaha · x · 2026-10-06
In the ongoing debate, @littmath cites concrete evidence: he has received emails from people who have generated 36000 papers with AI, making the 'end of human refereeing' seem plausible. Saha responds that one should raise standards, rely on traditional signals plus LLMs, and says it is too hasty to declare human refereeing dead.
More from AGI Musings
- AI evals' core confusion: treating them as adversarial is doomed, argues researcher — jankulveit · 2026-10-07
- Ex-Meta researcher Yuandong Tian: GPT-5 co-authored my last paper, so I started a company — ziv_ravid · 2026-10-07
- Alignment shouldn't impose worldviews: respecting users' freedom to inquire — AlexTensor · 2026-10-07
- AI consciousness deniers implicitly believe humans have magic souls, critic argues — cephaloform · 2026-10-07
- Team formalizes alignment theory in Lean, hiring Lean engineers now — geoffreyirving · 2026-10-07
- Chris Albon recommends Kevin Roose's AGI Chronicles podcast — chrisalbon · 2026-10-07