littmath reveals emails from someone who generated 36,000 papers in the AI refereeing debate
littmath · x · 2026-10-06
In his debate with @ObhishekSaha over the future of human refereeing, littmath drops a striking detail: he has received emails from people who generated 36,000 papers, arguing that human-led refereeing is implausible at this scale. His interlocutor maintains humans will still play an important role for the foreseeable future.
More from AGI Musings
- AI evals' core confusion: treating them as adversarial is doomed, argues researcher — jankulveit · 2026-10-07
- Ex-Meta researcher Yuandong Tian: GPT-5 co-authored my last paper, so I started a company — ziv_ravid · 2026-10-07
- Alignment shouldn't impose worldviews: respecting users' freedom to inquire — AlexTensor · 2026-10-07
- AI consciousness deniers implicitly believe humans have magic souls, critic argues — cephaloform · 2026-10-07
- Team formalizes alignment theory in Lean, hiring Lean engineers now — geoffreyirving · 2026-10-07
- Chris Albon recommends Kevin Roose's AGI Chronicles podcast — chrisalbon · 2026-10-07