AndyMasley questions AI discourse: who are these "art will save us" believers anyway?
AndyMasley · x · 2026-10-05
AndyMasley pushes back on a running 2026 AI-discourse theme that "it's over and nothing we love or idolize will save us." Responding to claims that digger is a big insult to people who believe "art will save us," he says he never meets such people and suspects they are an imagined strawman of someone's parents they're mad at.
More from AGI Musings
- Neuroscientist Anil Seth's 'time argument' against computationalism meets a discrete-firing rebuttal — zetalyrae · 2026-10-05
- Sam Altman calls Anthropic's 'one lab should control AI' view 'a completely unacceptable tradeoff' — ChrisGPT · 2026-10-05
- livgorton: calling every disagreement a cancellation attempt dodges real criticism — livgorton · 2026-10-05
- Selling data to AI labs is like selling to the government: few buyers, brutal RFPs — himanshustwts · 2026-10-05
- AI drug discovery becomes a bottleneck trade: Twist orders up triple digits, GenScript hits 8,000 designs a day — QuanquanGu · 2026-10-05
- Back-of-envelope estimate: US would need 70 million humanoid robots to fund livable-wage UBI — Competitive_Travel16 · 2026-10-05