Neuroscientists' 'time argument': consciousness needs physical time continuity, not just computation
dansitu · x · 2026-10-05
Anil Seth highlights the "time argument" (developed by MiTi Bennett) as a case against computational functionalism, echoing UCLA neuroscientist Dean Buonomano's work.
The core claim: standard Turing computation only cares about sequence, but neurophysiology and consciousness depend on the continuity of physical time itself. Brains and conscious experiences aren't just embodied and embedded — they are entimed. Seth points to his Big Think essay and his author response in BBS Journal for elaboration.
Related event: New Paper Argues Machine Consciousness Impossible on Serial Hardware(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Living Science proposal: papers as living, updatable units of scientific knowledge — ChenhaoTan · 2026-10-05
- AI removed the friction: creation is now 'I have an idea, I ask for it' — signulll · 2026-10-05
- "OpenAI is run by X, Anthropic is run by Claude": AI joke goes viral — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-05
- Elon Musk at YC AI Startup School on digital superintelligence and being useful — elonmusk · 2026-10-05
- Google researcher: the five stages of grief describe reactions to AI better than actual grief — moultano · 2026-10-05
- Even if ants were proven conscious, society wouldn't act on it — and that mirrors AI's consciousness dilemma — jessi_cata · 2026-10-05