Codex Pro 200 users race to spend banked resets before allowance reportedly drops from 20x to 10x
tobenvanhoben_ · reddit · 2026-10-04
A heavy Codex Pro 200 user is probing two things: whether a "warm cache" effect makes longer sessions cheaper as more context gets cached, and how banked usage resets interact with the rumored reduction of the grandfathered Pro 200 allowance from 20x to 10x. If resets simply restore whatever allowance applies at reset time, spending them before the cut is far more valuable — so his plan is to drain the weekly quota and burn all banked resets before the change. He's asking the community for measurements or official OpenAI clarification.
More from Models
- Suspicious output differences suggest Anthropic is quietly testing Haiku 5.5 — legit_api · 2026-10-04
- Dev hammers Opus 5.5 all week and still never hits the usage cap — therealdanvega · 2026-10-04
- Kimi K3 with 1M context now usable in Claude Code via engy inference — richdotca · 2026-10-04
- Anthropic rumored to be quietly testing Fable 5.5, with a Tuesday Oct 6 release circulating — mark_k · 2026-10-04
- Two prompts were all it took: Opus 5.5 demo impresses with near-complete output — fekdaoui · 2026-10-04
- ChatGPT bug leaks internal Tasks system prompt and hidden /local automation endpoint — mytrackpadisbroken · 2026-10-04