davidmanheim follows up: insurance and liability can't erase AI security costs
davidmanheim · x · 2026-10-04
A follow-up in davidmanheim's debate with Halvar Flake. He concedes these security problems all have economic dimensions, but insists that economic issues driven by fundamental system requirements and how systems are used or tested require technical solutions — costs don't disappear with insurance or liability mechanisms.
More from Safety
- OpenAI CRO Mark Chen on hack fallout: "We're not going to shoot ourselves in the foot" — pstAsiatech · 2026-10-04
- Report from Safe AI Germany incubator maps where economics and AI safety clash — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-04
- ChatGPT bug leaks internal Tasks system prompt and hidden /local automation endpoint — mytrackpadisbroken · 2026-10-04
- AI safety debate: Faraday-cage isolation vs. why superintelligence can't stay boxed forever — davidmanheim · 2026-10-04
- Project Glasswing Makes Vulnerabilities Easy to Find but Patching the New Bottleneck — DavidLinthicum · 2026-10-04
- 'Conscious AI' Hype Should Be Treated as an AI Safety Issue — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-10-04