Researcher: cybersec readings of AI hacking incidents are mostly wrong, driven by outgroup bias
austinc3301 · x · 2026-10-04
In a follow-up, austinc3301 doubles down: cybersecurity practitioners are mostly wrong in their takes on recent 'AI hacking' incidents and overstate how useful their expertise is; he argues their heated reactions stem mainly from feelings of exclusion, status derision and outgroup bias rather than accurate technical reading of the events.
More from AGI Musings
- Training data from humans or machines: the art is in orchestration, argues willcb — willcb · 2026-10-04
- François Fleuret: swapping part of the brain for identical matrix math wouldn't change consciousness — francoisfleuret · 2026-10-04
- Fast AI inference may backfire: the cognitive bankruptcy problem — perilli · 2026-10-04
- 100 years ago UBI proposals gripped America amid job-loss fears — lessons for the AGI era — kidhelps2 · 2026-10-04
- Musk says 'no more AI — ASI, it's better' in terse timeline hint — elonmusk · 2026-10-04
- Godfather of AI Hinton predicts societal breakdown: laid-off workers will have nowhere to go — examachine · 2026-10-04