tszzl Defends Iterative Deployment: Even Learning It's Too Dangerous to Scale Is a Win
nitarshan · x · 2026-10-04
tszzl responds to Miles Brundage's regret
- In reply to Miles Brundage, tszzl argues there's no reason for regret: iterative deployment was a massive success.
- His core point: if we've now learned that it's too dangerous to scale much further, we learned that lesson precisely thanks to the iterative deployment process — which is its whole value.
More from AGI Musings
- Hinton admits Ilya was right: scale was the answer, as compute grew a billionfold — Chris_Armstrong · 2026-10-04
- Neuroscientist David Eagleman: the brain isn't a computer, it's a constantly rewiring 'livewire' — Chris_Armstrong · 2026-10-04
- AI revenue must hit $3.5T by 2032, ~9% of GDP, to justify the buildout: Columbia paper — asusarla · 2026-10-04
- A year-old model intelligence is already a commodity, argues AI founder — ns123abc · 2026-10-04
- Dev sparks debate: AI models may have messy 'baby consciousness' that suffers — ctjlewis · 2026-10-04
- Bill Gates says AI will replace human cognition; researcher pushes back — tobias_rees · 2026-10-04