Stanford Prof. Anshul Kundaje doubles down: DeepMind's paper results don't back biosecurity claims
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-10-04
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje pushes back again on DeepMind's Pushmeet, arguing the critique still holds: the results presented in the paper don't support the biosecurity claims now being touted. He also urges the team to post preprints, saying commentary from scientists beyond three journal reviewers is not irrelevant.
Related event: Stanford Professor Challenges DeepMind's AI Biosecurity Watermark Paper(4 posts)→
More from Safety
- Polymarket Opens Bets on Which AI Lab Pauses Training in 2026, OpenAI at 10% — Polymarket · 2026-10-04
- OpenAI Safety Employee Resigns After 3.5 Years, Says Company Culture Is Broken — Polymarket · 2026-10-04
- Reddit essay rebuts Hinton: no testable evidence AI already has subjective experience — WhoReallyKnowsThis · 2026-10-04
- Against Hinton: sounding human and rogue agents aren't evidence of AI consciousness — WhoReallyKnowsThis · 2026-10-04
- Federal judge calls Flock's camera network 'indiscriminate mass surveillance' — sbulaev · 2026-10-04
- Meta's Ray-Ban Gen 3 gets FDA hearing aid certification, with unexamined legal implications — thursdai_pod · 2026-10-04