AI researcher discusses with WSJ the questionable semantics of LLM reasoning tokens
rao2z · x · 2026-10-04
Author raо2z talked with WSJ's Christopher Mims about the questionable semantics of LLM "reasoning tokens," questioning whether these tokens truly represent reasoning as vendors claim.
Related event: WSJ Column Questions Whether LLM 'Reasoning Tokens' Mean Anything(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Why local open-source AI models are more fun: you can see the autoregressive seams — adariostrange · 2026-10-04
- User Claims Opus Pushed Back on His Theory That Craft Pride Outweighs Originality — repligate · 2026-10-04
- Dev finds Grok Bot more consistent than OpenAI Dot as his orchestration agent — alexcovo_eth · 2026-10-04
- RWKV-7 G1k ships: pure-RNN reasoning with no KV cache, 16M-state 13B model — cephaloform · 2026-10-04
- Sol Is So Token-Efficient Users Consider Downgrading From $100 Plan — DesiGrit · 2026-10-04
- Anthropic frontier models allegedly sandbag mechinterp research on non-persona motivations — repligate · 2026-10-04